|
Botanists Explore Tallgrass Aspen Prairie
By Nancy Sather and Robert Dana
Our course lay on the east side of the river, through a beautiful level prairie studded with willow bushes. ... A very perceptible change was observed in the prairie the next day. ... Hummocks of aspen and willow relieved the sameness of the scenery. ... Between Pine River and Middle River the soil preserves its light character, the trail running for many miles on ancient lake ridges or beaches.
--Henry Hind, October 1857
If explorer Henry Hind were to repeat this journey today, he would find no trace of the "beautiful level prairie" on the east side of the Red River. Since European settlers first introduced wheat to the Red River valley in the early 1800s, Hind's rich prairies have been entirely converted to cropland. Much the same fate has befallen all of Minnesota's tallgrass prairie, which by building some of the world's finest agricultural soils assured its own destruction.
However, on reaching the beach ridges, Hind would find himself in familiar surroundings, a brushy prairie full of "hummocks of aspen and willow." Here in the tallgrass aspen parkland, tens of thousands of acres have been spared the plow.
Tallgrass Aspen Parkland in Minnesota (Photo ©
John Gregor, courtesy The Nature Conservancy)
Unlike the tallgrass prairie, which is extinct as a naturally functioning ecosystem, the parkland survives in sufficient acreage to function much as it did when Hind journeyed there. Because it is a dynamic landscape, maintained by cycles of wet and dry years, frequent fire, and natural recovery, the parkland's future as a biological phenomenon depends on large, intact blocks of land.
The survival of this ecosystem is the result of a fortuitous combination of the agriculturally inhospitable nature of the landscape, its history of settlement, and the foresight of individuals who decades ago recognized its value for wildlife. Recent recognition that the tallgrass aspen parkland is an ecosystem found only in northwestern Minnesota and adjacent Manitoba has brought new urgency to the task of conserving it for future generations.
Natural Patchwork
The tallgrass aspen parkland extends roughly from Red Lake Falls, Minnesota, to Winnipeg, Manitoba, encompassing 1.2 million acres. It is the northernmost expression of the transition between tallgrass prairie and forest ecosystems. In Minnesota it is sandwiched between the conifer forests and peatlands north of Red Lake and the croplands in the former rich prairies of the Red River valley.
Scarcely an explorer passed through the parkland without commenting on the islands of willow and aspen that everywhere interrupted the prairie expanse. Colorful township names attest to the patchwork: Marsh Grove, Eckvoll - Norwegian for oak vale, and Espelie - also Norwegian, meaning poplar slope.
Today, the intact areas are still a mosaic of trembling aspen and balsam poplar groves, prairies, and sedge-dominated fens dotted with willow and bog birch. A striking feature is the abundance of shrubs - more than 25 species - in the prairies and meadows, resulting in a native plant community known as brush prairie.
Most of the area is level and poorly drained, smoothed first by flowing ice and later by the waters of Glacial Lake Agassiz. The most prominent topographic features are 10,000 year old beach ridges of Glacial Lake Agassiz that rise a mere 25 feet above the plains and trend sinuously northward through the center of Marshall and Kittson counties. Their sandy soils once supported strings of oak savanna and dry prairie, fragments of which still remain.
Important trails for pre-European peoples and bison, these beach ridges also provided an upland route for thousands of ox carts hauling furs from posts in the Red River valley and Canada to St. Paul throughout most of the 19th century.
Railroad Legacy
In 1879 the U.S. government granted alternating square-mile blocks of land throughout the northern Red River valley, including most of the aspen parkland, to a railroad company - later to become part of James J. Hill's empire - to finance the construction of rail service into the area. By 1912 the Kittson County plat atlas showed that the land most promising for agriculture had nearly all been sold. However, in several large areas of poor agricultural potential, the railroad's ownership remained largely intact.
Impressed by the wildlife value of these vast blocks of parkland, Robert Farmes, the Department of Natural Resources area wildlife manager for northwestern Minnesota in the early 1960s, sought to protect them as public wildlife lands.
In 1969 Kittson County approved plans for Beaches Lake and Caribou wildlife management areas, and the Department of Natural Resources began buying tax-forfeited land within the units.
Elk feeding in an oat field in Kittson County (Photo courtesy The Nature Conservancy)
By 1990 the state owned most of the land within the Wildlife Management Areas, except for the checkerboard of former railroad properties, which had been purchased for speculation by an out-of-state investor group before Beaches Lake and Caribou had been created. Development of these tracts would fragment the parkland, reducing their value to wildlife.
The investors offered their land in Beaches Lake Wildlife Management Area for sale. The Nature Conservancy of Minnesota, a private conservation organization dedicated to protecting areas important for biodiversity, bought all 6,900 acres and transferred them to the Department of Natural Resources in 1993.
Soon after, a Swiss entrepreneur who had bought most of the old railroad lands in and around Caribou Wildlife Management Area decided to sell many of the undeveloped tracts. Again, The Nature Conservancy bought the land and transferred the 4,300 acres in Caribou to the Department of Natural Resources. With these two transactions, the early vision for Beaches Lake and Caribou wildlife management areas, respectively the largest and second largest contiguous blocks of tallgrass aspen parkland in the United States, has come close to realization.
Paradise for Wildlife
Sharp-tailed grouse (Photo courtesy Minnesota DNR)
Although the thousands of bison, prairie wolves, and elk seen by early explorers are gone, the parkland harbors the state's second largest population of moose, and it is one of the few places in Minnesota where the sharp-tailed grouse still reaches populations of adequate size to be hunted.
The aspen parkland supports not only a variety of common waterfowl, but also horned grebes, red-necked grebes, sandhill cranes, and Wilson's phalaropes. Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge and Thief Lake Wildlife Management Area are keystone areas for migratory waterfowl, including colonial waterbirds and other nongame species.
Not only does the parkland support a large diversity of species, but it also provides habitat for some of the state's rarest plants and animals, as documented by the Minnesota County Biological Survey in the early 1990s.
For example, the survey discovered that the aspen parkland is the stronghold in Minnesota for the rare yellow rail, once believed to be imperiled in the state. In addition to 35 new locations for the yellow rail, the survey documented 285 new locations for six other rare bird species, four locations for rare mammals, 19 for rare butterflies, and nearly 200 for 36 rare plant species.
Dynamic Interplay
The large areas of parkland provide an unprecedented opportunity to protect sufficient acreage of a still intact ecosystem to ensure that natural processes can continue to maintain it.
In his journal in 1860, Hind noted the delicate balance between prairie and trees and the role of fire. "If a portion of prairie escapes fire for two or three years the result is seen in the growth of willows and aspens, first in patches, then in large areas, which in a short time become united and cover the country, thus retarding evaporation and permitting the accumulation of vegetable matter in the soil. A fire comes, destroys the young forest growth and establishes a prairie once more."
Sandhill crane and chick (Photo courtesy USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center)
It is this dynamic interplay of the coarseness of the soil - which influences drainage profoundly - topography, weather, and fire that creates the patchy landscape. Historically, the parkland occupied a broad zone of gradual transition where neither prairie, forest, nor peatland could gain the upper hand, but elements of all three could intermingle. The beach ridges, extensive wetlands, and annual precipitation in the area impeded the spread of fire enough to allow fire tolerant shrubs and trees to persist and a shallow layer of peat to form in depressions.
Fire is still fundamental to this ecosystem, but because people will continue to live and farm here, carefully planned prescribed burns must serve the dynamic function noted by Hind. With that effort comes the cost of creating firebreaks and employing crews to manage the fire. Consolidation of ownership reduces risks of property damage and allows for efficient use of work crews and financial resources. Large contiguous tracts allow managers to replicate the scale of historical wildfires and thus preserve the natural patchiness of the landscape.
The benefits of large public lands and landscape-scale management are myriad. After a century of often failed attempts at agriculture in "cold bottom" land far from markets and fraught with drainage problems, natural processes are being restored. Open habitat is being reclaimed for declining brushland species such as sharp-tailed grouse. Counties are receiving payments in lieu of taxes that often exceed former tax rates, frequently on lands that have gone through cycles of tax forfeiture.
Conservation management at this landscape scale can help ensure adequate habitat for all parkland species, from moose to prairie voles, from the most cryptic beak-rush to the showiest of orchids, the smallest yellow rail to the giant sandhill crane.
* * *
{Nancy Sather and Robert Dana are botanists and plant ecologists with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program and Minnesota County Biological Survey.
This article originally appeared in "Minnesota Conservation Volunteer," a bimonthly magazine published by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. To view the current issue or subscribe, go to http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/volunteer/index.html}
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2002. All rights reserved.
|