|
Wing Dams Deepen Midwest Flood Waters
ST. LOUIS, Missouri, February 4, 2002 (ENS) - In 1997, the year's
single most costly disaster was the massive spring floods in the Upper
Midwest that ravaged Minnesota and the Dakotas, costing U.S. taxpayers
$730.8 million in disaster relief. The Ohio River Valley Floods in 1997 and
the Texas Floods in 1998 each cost more than $100 million in federal funds.
Volunteers on the sandbag line fight the
1997 spring flood in Fargo, North Dakota. (Photo courtesy
FEMA)
These floods are part of an increasing pattern of disasters, says the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA). Damage from more frequent and severe weather calamities
and other natural phenomena during the decade 1990 to 1999 required 460
major disasters to be declared, nearly double the number of Presidential
declarations issued for the previous 10 years and more than any other
decade on record.
Flooding resulting from severe storms and other causes was the most
frequently declared type disaster, with more than $7.3 billion committed by
FEMA in response and recovery funding. The most costly of these were the
Midwest Floods in 1993 which required the expenditure of $1.17 billion.
In the Midwest, floods are worse than ever, and human engineering is
responsible for the increase in flood damage, two professors in the Department of Earth and
Planetary Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis have found.
Dr. Robert Criss and Dr. Everett Shock say that recent flood magnitudes and
frequencies cannot be blamed on global warming or climate change, the
popular notions. They point to human engineering of the rivers to try to
control them for navigation.
In their paper, "Flood Enhancement through Flood Control," published in the
October issue of the journal "Geology," Criss and Shock lay the primary
blame for increased flood levels on the Missouri and Mississippi rivers
over the past century on the placement of wing dams on the nation's largest
rivers.
Wing dam (Photo courtesy courtesy
of Ecological
Building Systems)
Wing dams are jetties of rock placed nearly perpendicular along river
banks, and are intended to stabilize channels and to keep water levels high
in mid-river for barge traffic. In the reaches of both rivers in Missouri
there are literally thousands of wing dams, many visible through a car
windshield.
Most of them were built in the 1930s and '40s by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. During low flow, the wing dams keep the channel deeper for barge
traffic, and increase water velocity in the center for a stable,
self-scouring channel.
But under flood conditions, Criss says, the structures act like scale in a
pipe. They actually slow water velocity and constrict the channel, impeding
the flow of water, forcing flood levels to rise.
"The main problem with wing dams is that they make flood waters deeper,"
said Criss. "For floods of a given magnitude, the depth of water is much
greater when you have them compared with places without them. In many areas
of Missouri with wing dams, flood water can be 10 feet higher
than it was before they were built."
Flooded homes on the swollen Mississippi
at Campbell's Island, Illinois, April 26, 2001 (Photo courtesy
FEMA)
Criss and Shock compared flood stage levels of the middle Mississippi River
from the confluence of the Missouri River down to the Ohio River, and the
lower Missouri River, both heavily lined with wing dams, to the Meramec
River in Missouri, which is one of the few free flowing rivers in the
United States, and the Ohio River at Cincinnati.
The Ohio there is free of wing dams but does have levees and navigational
locks and dams, which show little effect on water depth over 140 years of
data.
Both the Meramec and Ohio rivers show constant flood levels through the
years on graphs Criss and Shock drew up. The Mississippi and Missouri
rivers, dotted with wing dams, show rising lines throughout the past
century. This comparison clarifies the consequences of different
engineering practices over time.
"Where none of this kind of engineering occurred, the records today look
just like the records of 100 years ago," said Criss. "Such is not the case
on the heavily engineered Mississippi River at St. Louis. Before World War
II, floods that reached 38 feet or higher at St. Louis were very rare,
occurring only about every 50 years, but now flood stages of this magnitude
occur every five years or so."
"Severe flooding is commonplace now. If you look at our table and graphs,
you see the trends are going up," Criss said. "The government is misleading
the public by saying the Great Flood of '93 was a once in 200 year event,
or even a 70 year event. Our data show it won't take a century for a flood
like that to reoccur. I would not even be surprised if it happened in the
next 15 years."
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2002. All rights reserved. |